‘s Act 22, Argentina was the enactment of Act 22, in . 13 “ Multicanal SA y otro s/Denuncia Infracción Ley 22,, ASCJ. 22, () (Ley de Defensa de a Competencia/Competition Defense Act/ CDA) –95, , –13, Arts 1–2. El resto del artículo describe la aplicación de la ley argentina de With the adoption of the provisions of Act 22,, the Argentine antitrust case law began to.
|Published (Last):||4 June 2009|
|PDF File Size:||16.85 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||1.19 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Argentina – The Dominance and Monopolies Review – Edition 6 – The Law Reviews
Finally, on 25 AugustAct No. Section 1 of the Antitrust Law establishes: In cases of abuse of dominant position based on exploitative conduct, the concerns of the antitrust authorities include price discrimination, imposition of exploitative prices, and any other conduct that tends to differentiate prices and commercial conditions between competitors in the same market.
The definition of dominant position is stated in the Antitrust Law as follows: Dominant position is not forbidden by the Antitrust Law — the prohibition is only focused on the abuse of such dominant position.
The Government Procurement Review Edition 6 Editors Jonathan Davey and Amy Gatenby Addleshaw Goddard LLP Government contracts, which are of considerable value and importance, often account for 10 to 20 per cent of gross domestic product in any given state, and government spending is often high profile, with the capacity to shape the future lives of local residents. Abuses of dominant position cases mostly occur through a filing made by any natural or legal person. Such conduct may include, but is not limited to:.
222262 from ” https: The Oil and Gas Law Review. Further to 22262 analysis of the market shares of the companies, the antitrust authorities also focus their attention on barriers.
Notwithstanding this, an investigation may also be initiated ex officio by the antitrust authorities. The Acquisition and Leveraged Finance Review. Having reached the stage of defining the relevant market for a product, the next step is to do the same in geographical terms.
Despite this, the Pey Law gives the opportunity for the denounced to make an arrangement with the antitrust authorities by which it commits to cease immediately the conduct that affects competition. China and India, to take just two examples, are moving rapidly up the value chain and now have world-class technology companies for which intellectual property protection is crucial.
File:Alfonso X noven 22262.jpg
For example, antitrust litigation has been a key component of the antitrust regime for decades in the United States. Business-focused legal analysis and insight in the most significant jurisdictions worldwide Interested in contributing?
This section comprises, to the extent the conditions of the foregoing paragraph are met, the obtention of significant competitive advantages through the infringement of other rules, as declared by an administrative act or final judgment.
Chapter 2, Section 4 of the Antitrust Law is exclusively focused on dominant position. The Secretary of Trade has full power to investigate and decide on the existence of anticompetitive conduct, either at the request of a party or ex officio. Finally, any agreements or terms and conditions that infringe lfy Antitrust Law may be declared null and void.
File:Alfonso X noven jpg – Wikimedia Commons
Investigations of anticompetitive conduct or analyses of leu and acquisitions made by the CNDC end with a non-binding recommendation to the Secretary of Trade. The Sports Law Review. Infringements of the Antitrust Law regarding the abuse of a dominant position may result in harsh consequences for both the infringing company and its individual employees. Specifically, regarding anticompetitive cases, he has stated that conduct cases that were initiated with an aim differing from the protection of market competition will be dismissed and closed.
The relevant market of the product shall comprise all products and services that consumers consider interchangeable or substitutable by reason of their characteristics, price and intended use.
Permission Reusing this file. This image is annotated: VII Private Enforcement Section 51 of 2262 Antitrust Law states that individuals and companies 222262 have been affected by anticompetitive conduct have the right to sue in judicial courts and claim for damages.
Welcome to the second edition of The Healthcare Law Review. Therefore, companies that have a dominant position should avoid participating in what may be considered as abusive conduct. This bill was approved last April 19 by the Senate with some changes, and has been sent to the lley for final approval.
Furthermore, the authority may convene a public audience review at any step of the procedure if the investigation merits it or to obtain more information on the investigation. The Franchise Law Review. We also see evolution and refinement of approaches to competition law enforcement in 26 jurisdictions around the world. 222262 correspondence has been reviewed by an OTRS member and stored in our permission archive.
The most important case in Argentine competition history regarding the abuse of a dominant position involved exploitative conduct, specifically, price discrimination, in the National Commission for the Defence of Competition v.
If you wish to use this contentyou do not need to request permission as long as you follow any licensing requirements mentioned on this page. The Antitrust Law does not prohibit conducts per se ; conducts must be analysed in all ely by the rule-of-reason criteria, and for sanctioning, the antitrust authorities must prove an actual or potential damage to the general economic interest.
Yacimientos Petroliferos Fiscales case.