Sfarsitul istoriei si neoliberalism de-a pururi?! On those events, Professor Fukuyama asserted: “What we may be witnessing is not just the end of the Cold War. 10 Fukuyama, Sfarsitul istoriei? (original English title: The end of history?). During the same year, another publishing house published Fukuyama’s extended. Francis Fukuyama. Sfarsitul istoriei si ultimul om. Pe masura ce tumultuosul secol XX se indreapta plin de spaima spre sfarsitul sau prabusirea comunismului.

Author: Doumi Kekazahn
Country: Luxembourg
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Environment
Published (Last): 1 June 2017
Pages: 382
PDF File Size: 10.81 Mb
ePub File Size: 19.94 Mb
ISBN: 867-9-50856-380-6
Downloads: 45977
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Kigalkree

But these problems are not obviously insoluble on the basis of liberal principles, istoriej so serious that they would necessarily lead to the collapse of society as a whole, as communism collapsed in the s. In particular, the spectacular abundance of advanced liberal economies and the infinitely diverse consumer culture made possible by them seem to both foster and preserve liberalism in the political sphere.

This does not by any means imply the end of international conflict per se. InFukuyama published the book Falling Behind: Ceea ce a suscitat multe discuii, a fost perspectiva autorului asupra istoriei din articolul premergtor crii, perspectiv ce nu a fost receptat conform ateptrilor lui Fukuyama, aa c n public aceast carte, adugnd articolului latura omului contemporan.

Kstoriei believe that they have a certain worth, and when other people treat them as though they are worth less than that, they experience the emotion of anger. Some disenfranchised Muslims thrill istoroei the rantings of Fukuyam bin Laden or Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejadbut the appeal of this kind of medieval Islamism is strictly limited.

He considered the challenge of China and Russia to be the major threat, since they could pose a viable rival model which could inspire other states.

Recenzie [Sfarsitul Istoriei – Francis Fukuyama] – [DOC Document]

It all depends on what you mean by socialism. Fukuyama are o opinie destul de optimista asupra angajarii umanitatii in acest proces progresiv, evolutiv, care istkriei sfarsitul istoriei. Omul contemporan triete astzi ntr-un sistem de libertate supravegheat, mai puin brutal dect al cenzurii sfarsigul, dar mult mai eficient.


Bush after the September 11, attacks that suggested the U. The desire for recognition may at first appear to be an unfamiliar concept, but it is as old as the tradition of Western political philosophy, and constitutes a thoroughly familiar part of the human personality.

Argumentul care intareste opinia dupa care istoria va cunoaste un sfarsit este impartit in trei. Se pare, realitatea nu poate infirma faptul ca unele dintre aceste “profetii” deja se produc sau sunt pe cale sa devina functionale. Acest punct final l vede Fukuyama ca fiind democraia liberal.

They isgoriei entirely to the realm of philosophy or religion, owing their birth to the Gospels of Philosophy of Hegel. All countries undergoing economic modernisation must increasingly resemble one another: Our task is not to answer exhaustively the challenges to liberalism promoted by every crackpot messiah around the world, but only those that are embodied in important social or political forces and movements, and which are therefore part of world history.

In that tradition, the prideful quest for recognition was to be subordinated to enlightened self-interest — desire combined with reason — and particularly the desire for self-preservation of the body.

From the Industrial Revolution to the Present Day The Soviet Union, then, is at a fork in the road: Inin America at the CrossroadsFukuyama discusses the history of neoconservatism, with particular focus on its major tenets and political implications. When the natural fear of death leads one combatant to submit, the relationship of master and slave is born.

For one thing, most “liberal” European societies were illiberal insofar as they believed in the legitimacy of imperialism, that is, the right of one nation to rule over other nations without regard for the wishes of the ruled.

Francis Fukuyama

Retrieved May 5, Pentru Hegel, sfarsitul istoriei era statul liberal, iar pentru Marx societatea comunista. Astfel, democraia liberal produce oameni sfafsitul inimi, alctuii structural din dorin i raiune, dar lipsii de thymos, oameni care nu simt necesitatea unor realizri superioare, mulumii de soarta lor i fr a se ruina din cauza incapacitilor de a se ridica deasupra unor nevoi meschine.


To say that history ended in meant that mankind’s ideological evolution ended in the ideals of the French or American Revolutions: The real question for the future, however, is the degree to which Soviet elites have assimilated the consciousness of the universal homogenous state that is post-Hitler Europe. Yet another unfortunate legacy of Marxism is our tendency to retreat into materialist or utilitarian explanations of political or historical phenomena, and our disinclination to believe in the autonomous power of ideas.

Some have argued against the book due to an ideological disagreement with the concept of liberal democracy. I have neither the space nor, frankly, the ability to defend in depth Hegel’s radical idealist perspective. Beginning with the famous third plenum of the Tenth Central Committee inthe Chinese Communist party set about decollectivizing agriculture for the million Chinese who still lived in the countryside. AristotleFriedrich NietzscheC. This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner.

Twenty-five years later, the most serious threat to the end-of-history hypothesis isn’t that there is a higher, better model out there that will someday supersede liberal democracy; neither Islamist theocracy nor Chinese capitalism cuts it.

Many of the wars and revolutions fought since that time have been undertaken in the name of ideologies which claimed to be more advanced than liberalism, but whose pretensions were ultimately unmasked by history.

Fukuyama sketches a brief history of man’s changing understanding of human nature: Nonetheless, neither country ion the eve of its reforms was in such a state of material crisis that one could have predicted the surprising reform paths ultimately taken.